Fewer opting for Michigan nursing homes

Drop comes despite aging population

August 3, 2001

BY JULIE EDGAR
FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

CENSUS 2000 -- Fewer people are living in Michigan's nursing homes, despite the growing numbers of folks moving into old age, according to data from the 2000 census released this week.

The 13-percent drop in the state's nursing home population since 1990 is most prominent in metropolitan areas: In 2000, there were 1,130 fewer nursing home residents in Detroit, 743 fewer in Grand Rapids and 562 fewer in Flint. Most places lost nursing home residents, with exceptions like Ypsilanti, which went from 78 to 209 residents, and Waterford Township, which went from 112 to 274 residents.

The decline during the decade, from 57,622 to 50,113 residents, is dramatic. It puts Michigan's total nursing home population on a par with smaller states such as Indiana and Missouri, with populations of approximately 6 million and 5.5 million, respectively.

The reasons for the decline range from better medical treatment of chronic age-related disease to newer housing options for seniors and a bigger emphasis on home-based care. Michigan also offers the Medicaid waiver to about 15,000 low-income adults who buy from a menu of services, from their own home or assisted-living residences.

"People want alternatives to nursing homes," said Mike Connors, a spokesman for the Michigan Campaign for Quality Care, a grassroots advocacy group for people living in the state's 450 nursing homes. "We've moved forward in providing more in-home services."

The movement away from nursing homes -- defined by the Census Bureau as offering continuous in-patient nursing care -- reflects the growing popularity of assisted living, which comes in a variety of forms. All offer assistance with daily activities like bathing and dressing, and many specialize in serving people with dementia and offer a higher level of medical expertise.

"We've seen assisted-living facilities staffing up and offering almost quasi-nursing services," said Bruce Rosenthal, director of media relations for the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.

Along with the explosion in alternatives to nursing homes is a change in the kind of client served by them.

Today's nursing home resident is older and sicker than 10 years ago, Rosenthal said. Even a decade ago, few options were open to seniors who couldn't manage on their own and didn't have the family support to stay in their homes.

A survey by Nursing Home Statistical Yearbook found a significant drop between 1997 and 2000 in the number of nursing home residents who could walk with a cane or walker, and a slight rise in the number of residents needing more assistance with basic activities like transferring from bed to a chair, bathing and using the toilet.

And today, nursing home stays are shorter on average.

The journal Medical Care in 1997 reported that 66 percent of nursing home residents stay three months or less. Only 10 percent stay 1-3 years.

Despite the trend, it doesn't translate to higher savings by the state. The proportion of nursing home residents subsidized by Medicaid -- 70 percent -- has held steady for at least a decade, said Geralyn Lasher, a spokeswoman for the Michigan Department of Community Health. She suggested that more affluent seniors are staying out of nursing homes because they can afford the alternatives.

Next year's state budget for nursing home care includes a very slight increase -- from $1.05 billion to $1.06 billion.

Lasher said the state is committed to keeping people in their own homes or in settings as close to home as possible.

Connors said he's waiting to see evidence of the commitment.

"A lot of work needs to be done, especially legislatively, for people to get the kind of supports they want," he said. "The state spends over $1 billion on nursing home care. Some of what needs to be done, aside from allocating more resources, is to shift resources from the institutional model that people don't want to community-based services the community is clamoring for."

Contact JULIE EDGAR at 248-586-2605 or edgar@freepress.com.