House Adopts Long-Term Care Tax Bill, Expected to Pass Treasury- Postal Spending Plan


The House on July 23 approved a GOP long-term care bill granting taxpayers who cover at least half the costs of their long-term insurance premiums an above-the-line deduction and providing a $3,000 credit for caregivers assisting those with long-term care needs.

Document Type: News Stories

Tax Analysts Document Number: Doc 2002-17135 (2 original pages)

Tax Analysts Electronic Citation: 2002 TNT 142-1

Citations: (23 Jul 2002)


=============== SUMMARY ===============


House lawmakers on July 23 approved a Republican long-term care bill (H.R. 4946) granting taxpayers who cover at least half the costs of their long-term insurance premiums an above-the-line deduction and providing a new $3,000 credit for caregivers who assist family members with long-term care needs.

At press time, the House was debating the fiscal 2003 Treasury- Postal appropriations bill and was expected to approve the measure.

The House Ways and Means Committee originally adopted the Improving Access to Long-Term Care Act of 2002 on a bipartisan vote of 29 to 6 in early June after a marathon Medicare reform and prescription drug markup. The bill has been cosponsored by Republican taxwriters J.D. Hayworth of Arizona, Kevin Brady of Texas, Phil English of Pennsylvania, Ron Lewis of Kentucky, Scott McInnis of Colorado, Rob Portman of Ohio, Jim Ramstad of Minnesota, Wes Watkins of Oklahoma, and Jerry Weller of Illinois.

The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated the bill would cost $98 million in 2003 and $5.6 billion through 2012.

While Weller touted the bill as a "pro-family, pro-senior" initiative, bill author Hayworth said the coming retirement rush by the baby-boom generation and the growing number of seniors mandated action on the long-term insurance front. "Our nation is in dire need of long-term care reform," Hayworth said on the House floor.

Ways and Means Committee member Fortney Pete Stark, D-Calif., however, charged that the real motivation behind the legislation was to offset corporate losses resulting from skimpy long-term care plan sales. "This is some insurance salesman running amok and writing a bill," he asserted, labeling the Hayworth proposal "at best unnecessary and at worst a wasteful expenditure of $5.5 billion."


=============== FULL TEXT ===============


House lawmakers on July 23 approved a Republican long-term care bill (H.R. 4946) granting taxpayers who cover at least half the costs of their long-term insurance premiums an above-the-line deduction and providing a new $3,000 credit for caregivers who assist family members with long-term care needs.

At press time, the House was debating the fiscal 2003 Treasury- Postal appropriations bill and was expected to approve the measure. (For prior coverage, see Doc 2002-16870 (2 original pages) [PDF] or 2002 TNT 139-4 .)

The House Ways and Means Committee originally adopted the Improving Access to Long-Term Care Act of 2002 on a bipartisan vote of 29 to 6 in early June after a marathon Medicare reform and prescription drug markup. The bill has been cosponsored by Republican taxwriters J.D. Hayworth of Arizona, Kevin Brady of Texas, Phil English of Pennsylvania, Ron Lewis of Kentucky, Scott McInnis of Colorado, Rob Portman of Ohio, Jim Ramstad of Minnesota, Wes Watkins of Oklahoma, and Jerry Weller of Illinois.

The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated the bill would cost $98 million in 2003 and $5.6 billion through 2012.

While Weller touted the bill as a "pro-family, pro-senior" initiative, bill author Hayworth said the coming retirement rush by the baby-boom generation and the growing number of seniors mandated action on the long-term insurance front. "Our nation is in dire need of long-term care reform," Hayworth said on the House floor.

Ways and Means Committee member Fortney Pete Stark, D-Calif., however, charged that the real motivation behind the legislation was to offset corporate losses resulting from skimpy long-term care plan sales. "This is some insurance salesman running amok and writing a bill," he asserted, labeling the Hayworth proposal "at best unnecessary and at worst a wasteful expenditure of $5.5 billion."

Taxpayers earning between $20,000 and $40,000 (between $40,000 and $80,000 for joint filers) could claim the above-the-line deduction (adjusted annually for inflation and rounded to the nearest $1,000) for eligible long-term care insurance covering individuals, their spouses, or any eligible dependents. According to the JCT, the deduction provision would cost $648 million over five years and $2.4 billion through the next decade.

Individuals would also be eligible for an additional personal exemption -- beyond the existing $3,000 exemption -- for each qualified family member with long-term care needs. The exemption would phase in over the next decade, rising to $500 for 2003 and 2004, $1,000 in 2005 and 2006, $1,500 in 2007 and 2008, $2,000 in 2009 and 2010, $2,500 in 2011, and the full $3,000 (adjusted for inflation thereafter) from 2012 forward. The home caregiver credit is estimated to cost $787 million over five years and $2.9 billion over 10 years.

The bill also includes a handful of other tax changes that would (1) expand the eligibility for Archer medical savings accounts to Medicare+Choice account holders and allow employers to make contributions to an Archer MSA for employees already on Medicare; (2) expand human clinical trials qualifying for the orphan drug credit ($105 million over 5 years, $268 million over 10 years); (3) add any vaccine designed to combat Hepatitis A to the list of taxable children's vaccines ($26 million over five years, $58 million over 10); and, (4) update the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' consumer protection rules governing qualified long- term care insurance to reflect the new tax deduction.

Stark said the bill is just another attempt by GOP leaders to "subsidize corporations to the detriment of the poor while accomplishing very little."

According to Stark, JCT estimates suggest that 100,000 new customers will sign up for long-term care plans by 2012 because of the proposed tax changes -- a boost he insists adds up to a per capita "$5,600 bribe" for long-term care purchasers. "Why are we trying to get people to purchase something they don't need?" he asked.



Code Section: Miscellaneous
Geographic Identifier: United States
Subject Area: Budgets
Credits
Health care tax issues
Individual income taxation
Legislative tax issues
Cross Reference:
Author: Rojas, Warren
Institutional Author: Tax Analysts