| April 17, 2002
Press Release from:
Ed Slott,
CPA Publisher, Ed Slott's IRA
Advisor Rockville Centre,
NY 516-536-8282
April 17, 2002 - IRS Issues Final
Regulations on Retirement Plan Distributions
IRS has finalized the new
distribution rules that were proposed in January
2001.
The IRA distribution rules just got even better
than before! IRA owners, plan participants and their
beneficiaries will all benefit from the changes.
You can download a complete copy of the Final
Regulations as a PDF file or a Microsoft Word version
from the home page of our website http://www.irahelp.com/.
These new rules are effective January 1, 2003, but can
be used to calculate your 2002 required distributions.
These rules apply to beneficiaries as well as IRA owners
and plan participants.
In General Overall, the IRS kept the
general framework they created in the January 2001
Proposed Regulations based on the positive feedback they
received from both the public and professionals. The
changes in these Final Regulations are additional
simplifications and corrections to the Proposed
Regulations based on comments received over the last
year. There are also a number of valuable provisions
geared to beneficiaries that will let them correct prior
mistakes and take advantage of the new rules.
Here is a rundown of the major provisions:
New Life Expectancy Tables IRS has issued
new life expectancy factors for the three life
expectancy tables that IRA owners and beneficiaries use
to compute required minimum distributions. The three
tables are the Uniform Lifetime Table, the Single Life
Table and the Joint life Table. These tables can also be
downloaded from the homepage of our website at http://www.irahelp.com/.
The tables have not been changed in 20 years, but the
change in life expectancy is minor - only about an
additional year. You would have thought that after all
the advances in technology in the last 20 years, we
would have earned at least more than one year of
additional life expectancy.
The huge changes in the required distribution amounts
that resulted from the January 2001 Proposed Regulations
were due to a change in the method of using the life
expectancy tables, but the tables themselves did not
change. The Final Regulations changed the life
expectancy tables but kept the method of using them that
was established in the Proposed Regulations. Required
distributions and the resulting income tax will still be
slightly lower. Most people will pay less tax.
1. Uniform Lifetime Distribution Table This
will be used by most IRA owners and plan participants
for figuring lifetime required distributions - generally
after reaching age 70 ½. The only IRA owners who will
not use this table will be those whose spouse is their
sole beneficiary for the entire year and is more than 10
years younger (known as the "spousal exception").
Beneficiaries never use this table.
2. Joint Life Table This table is used
only for lifetime distributions and only when the
spousal exception applies (when the spouse is the sole
beneficiary and is more than 10 years younger than the
IRA owner). Beneficiaries never use this table.
3. Single Life Table This table is used by
designated beneficiaries to compute required minimum
distributions on inherited retirement accounts. This
table will never be used to compute lifetime required
distributions. Under the Final Regulations, this table
can also be used by designated beneficiaries to correct
or change the distributions schedule they were
locked-into under the old rules.
New Reporting Requirements IRS backed off
the reporting requirements for financial institutions
(the custodians and trustees holding IRA assets).
Beginning in 2003, the custodians will have to report
only to IRA owners and not the IRS. They can either give
the IRA owners their required distribution amount or
notify them that an amount is required and offer to
figure that amount upon the IRA owner's request. The
custodians do not have to report to beneficiaries at
this time.
Beginning in 2004, the custodians will have to report
to the IRS, accounts that are subject to required
minimum distributions but NOT the amounts. This is a
first step towards the broader goal of IRS reporting in
order to check compliance. Eventually, IRS wants to be
able to check that IRA owners and beneficiaries are
withdrawing and paying tax on the required amounts.
New Date for Determining the Designated
Beneficiary In the Proposed Regulations from
January 2001, the designated beneficiary was not
determined until December 31st of the year following the
year of the IRA owner's death. That was also the date
that the first required distribution was due on the
inherited account which in some cases would leave little
time to calculate and withdraw the required amounts. IRS
has fixed this problem by advancing the date that the
designated beneficiary is determined to September 30th
of the year following the year of the IRA owner's death.
This will give beneficiaries and financial institutions
an added three months to figure and withdraw required
amounts. This does not mean that a designated
beneficiary can be named after the death of the IRA
owner. All designated beneficiaries, both primary and
contingent, must be named by the IRA owner while he is
still breathing. Then, after death of the IRA owner, the
designated beneficiary can be changed, but only amongst
the group of beneficiaries named by the IRA owner.
Death During the "GAP" Period Since the
designated beneficiary is not determined until September
30th of the year following the year of the IRA owner's
death, a so-called "GAP" period is created. The gap
period is from the date of death until September 30th of
the year following the year of death. This gap period
concept was created by the 2001 Proposed Regulations,
but it raised the question of what would happen if the
beneficiary died during the gap period. In other words,
whose life expectancy would you use if the beneficiary
died before he became the designated beneficiary. The
Final Regulations answer this question by stating that
the life of the deceased beneficiary will be used if
that beneficiary dies in the gap period. Without this
clarification, the beneficiary could end up being the
estate of the deceased beneficiary which would mean
there is no designated beneficiary and the longer life
expectancy could not be used.
An Estate is NOT a Designated
Beneficiary This has always been the case, but
the IRS made it clear in the Final Regulations that this
is their position. This makes naming a beneficiary
crucial. If the beneficiary is named through a will or
through state law, that beneficiary will not be a
designated beneficiary and will not be able to use his
life expectancy to stretch distributions on an inherited
IRA. The life expectancy of an estate is zero because an
estate is not a designated beneficiary.
Beneficiaries Can Switch to the New
Rules The Final Regulations contain a provision
that will allow designated beneficiaries who inherited
years ago under the old rules to switch to the new
rules. Under the old rules many beneficiaries ended up
using the 5-year rule which meant that the entire
inherited account had to be withdrawn by the end of 5th
year following the year of death. But now if those
beneficiaries were named by the IRA owner as of his or
her death, they can switch to the life expectancy method
based on the new tables. The one condition is that they
have to take the distributions for the back years (if
they have not done so already). This can save
beneficiaries a fortune in taxes not to mention
extending the life of their inherited IRAs. Also, those
beneficiaries that were named by the IRA owner as of his
or her death can switch to the new life expectancy
tables even if they were not stuck with the 5-year rule,
but were using another less favorable life expectancy
method.
Multiple Beneficiaries If you have named
more than one beneficiary on a single IRA account, the
general rule is that after death, required distributions
have to be based on the age of the oldest beneficiary.
IRS has confirmed their position that if the accounts
are split into separate IRAs, then each beneficiary can
use his own life expectancy to compute required
distributions. The account must be split by the end of
the year following the year of the IRA owner's death.
Spousal Exception The spousal exception
(from the Proposed Regulations) says that if your spouse
is your sole beneficiary for the entire year and is more
than 10 years younger than you, then you do not have to
use the Uniform Lifetime Table for distributions and
instead you can use the actual joint life expectancy
from the joint life table.
Many people questioned what would happen if the
spouse died or got divorced during the year?" The Final
Regulations answered that question with a provision
stating that the marital status will be determined as of
January 1st of the distribution year. If the spouse dies
or gets divorced during the year, you can still use the
spousal exception for that year, but not for the
following year.
Trust Documentation In order for the
beneficiaries of a trust that is named as your IRA
beneficiary to qualify as designated beneficiaries,
several requirements must be complied with. One of those
requirements is to provide information on the trust
beneficiaries to the plan administrator or IRA custodian
or trustee. Under the new rules, that documentation must
be provided by October 31st of the year following the
year of the IRA owner's death. Old trusts that did not
qualify because of the documentation requirement, will
now be given until October 31, 2003 to provide the
required documentation.
72(t) Payment Schedules The new rules apply
to existing 72(t) payment schedules. The only people
affected would be those who were using the Minimum
Distribution method to calculate their 72(t) payments.
If you were using that method, you can now switch to the
new tables to compute future 72(t) payments and the
switch will NOT be considered a modification by IRS.
However, this will not apply to that many 72(t) payment
schedules since most people don't use the Minimum
Distribution Method because it produces the lowest
payouts.
Decline in Account Value - "The Enron
Effect" There is a 50% penalty for not taking a
required distribution. But what if there is not enough
money left in the IRA to take the full amount of your
required distribution? Until now, the tax law never
considered the possibility that your retirement account
could decrease in value.
Well at least the IRS has a heart. In one line of all
the 155 pages of Final Regulations, the IRS inserted
what I call "The Enron Effect Clause." It says that if
the value of your IRA or plan has dropped so much that
when you compute your required distribution based on
last year's ending balance, your required distribution
amount exceeds your entire account balance, then you can
simply empty the account. The IRS won't require you to
withdraw more than you have. You will not be subject to
the 50% penalty for not taking the full amount of your
required distribution. Isn't that nice?
Roth IRAs Required distributions from Roth
IRAs (which only applies to Roth IRA beneficiaries) are
now subject to the 50% penalty for not taking a required
distribution. The 50% penalty provision in the tax law
omitted Roth IRAs. The IRS has fixed that in the Final
Regulations, but the law still must be corrected by
Congress.
Older Beneficiaries Can Use the Longest
Life If you die after your Required Beginning
Date (after you reach age 70 ½) and your designated
beneficiary is older than you, your beneficiary can use
YOUR remaining life rather than their own. This will
give them a longer life expectancy than their own.
A detailed analysis of these and other provisions in
the Final Regulations will be included in the May 2002
(and future issues) of Ed Slott's IRA Advisor
newsletter. To order call 800-663-1340 or order on line
at http://www.irahelp.com/.
Subscription is $79.95/year, 12 issues; monthly.
-by Ed Slott,
CPA Copyright
2002
Ed Slott, CPA Publisher, Ed Slott's IRA
Advisor 100 Merrick Road - Suite 200
East Rockville Centre, New York 11570 (516)
536-8282
email: slottcpa@aol.com website:
http://www.irahelp.com/
ref:prapril
|